Home Entertainment

 

The Way Back Page - LaserDisc

March 26, 2010 By Richard Ames



Click the images below for bigger versions:
Pioneer DVL-919

Big. Shiny. Analog.

Released to the public in 1978, LaserDisc offered consumers a trifecta of the perfect product: no recording, expensive media and players and the need to flip the disc during the movie.

The response, historically speaking, was tepid.

Developed by Philips and MCA, LaserDisc confused consumers with multiple names from different companies: Laservision, Laser Videodisc and my personal favorite, DiscoVision. LaserDisc, as the format has come to be known, entered a world just starting to entertain the idea of watching movies at home whenever you want. VHS had a two-year head start in the market, Betamax three and each of these offered something even more novel to the burgeoning home video market: recording.

Pioneer LaserDisc AdvertWhat LaserDisc offered was significantly better picture and sound quality. By some estimates, LD had 40 percent better horizontal resolution over either tape format. Sadly, though, when the average screen size is in the 20-inch range, even VHS looks fine.

It was generally only those with projection televisions (front or rear) that could really see the difference. For them, the quality of LaserDisc was vital and adored.

Sound, too, was a significant step above the tape formats. Multiple audio tracks were available, including stereo PCM digital audio at CD-comparable bitrates and even surround sound. Looking back, it's almost amazing to think that not only did these gigantic CD-looking things have analog video, but the surround sound was often analog as well. Unless it was DTS. And getting that surround sound to work on your system required either a bit of luck or a lot of equipment.

Commentary tracks (sound familiar?), the better audio/video experience, and the large number of original aspect ratio releases enamored the format to movie buffs and videophiles. Sadly, though, these groups can't sustain a format indefinitely.

And wait, you need to get up during the movie? This was often the straw that broke the consumer interest. Better picture quality could not offset the expensive discs and players, the lack of recording or the lack of an uninterrupted movie.

A fringe format for two decades, DVD was the final blow. The few who said LD looked better than early DVDs were quickly silenced when anamorphic DVDs with better encoding became the norm. Pioneer was the last company to manufacture LaserDisc players. You can even find the DVL-919 (shown below) still on their website: a near anachronism of disco-era technology viewed on your computer on the Internet.

MCA was bought and sold and diluted over the years, eventually becoming part of French sewage treatment conglomerate Vivendi, as part of Universal Music Group. Philips went on to co-develop CD, DVD and even Blu-ray. The optical disc format they created lives on, in spirit anyway, in every disc you have in your library.

From front to back: LaserDisc, CD, DVD, Blu-RayConsumer electronics companies learned a lot from LaserDisc, mostly in what not to do. Marketing blunders were avoided by a unified format and name with DVD. Fitting the movie on one disc (layer change notwithstanding) was part of the original design spec. The increased quality, however, was not forgotten. With larger screen sizes looming, the need for DVD (and eventually, BD) was obvious. So while LaserDisc may often be the butt of jokes, it is in fact the progenitor of a direct line to where we are today: 1080p/24 on the last optical disc video format ever.

DISC PRICE: $35—40 (upwards of $80 in today's money)
LEGACY: High quality video in an optical format, bringing us DVD and later BD. And, thankfully, a movie on one disc.

Pioneer DVL-919

 

Comments

Also amazing to me is that Pioneer discontinued production of LD players only last year. February, I believe. In some ways, it's too bad the format is gone because the storage capacity of a disc that size would be tremendous. But portability would have been an issue.

The surround comment is misleading. I used a Fosgate DSM-3608, easy to connect, use and full bodied surround, especially Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade.

I only got into it last year. There were two childhood movies I cherished and never saw life as a DVD: Leaving Normal & Gold Diggers: Secret Of Bear Mountain. Wanting DVDs at the highest quality, I sought the laserdiscs and transferred them.

I love the technology. Obsolete but provides the best possible preservation source. My CLD-S104 entry level player looks better than VHS. My upcoming CLD-D704 should blow major chunks.

Ah, LD! How I miss thee. Well, only kinda sorta. Actually I owe my current career with Pioneer to LD. Back in the late 80's I wandered into a video rental store in Alexandria, VA on the recommendation of a friend, and walked right into a little kiosk showcasing Criterion's very first LD title: "Blade Runner". Now, I had only just seen BR broadcast on network TV a few weeks earlier, so I was astounded at the picture quality. I was even more fascinated by the widescreen format, which I had never seen before in a consumer video format. And that, of course, got me turned on to (and eventually seeking employment with) Pioneer.

Suffice to say, that's where my obsession with video and audio really began, and after scraping together some cash, picked up a Pioneer LD-383D. Now, in spite of being an avid Blu-ray connoisseur, my flagship 1990 Elite LD-S2 LaserDisc player still maintains a position of well-deserved glory in my A/V system.

I have a DVL-91, purchased in October 1999, and from time to time I still fire it up. There are about 160 LDs in the collection, some of which never made it to DVD as far as I know. Some of my vinyl never made it to CD, either. The LDs still sound great, however. And if I still had my CRT, they'd get as much play as my DVDs do now.

The thing that I miss the most about laserdisc is the uncompressed soundtracks. When I was in the home theater business I lost count of how many times I demonstated the impact of the center channel and the balance of a system with 'The Tiger In The Jungle' chapter from the original digital stereo edition, not the AC-3 remaster, of Apocalypse Now! When the AC-3 laserdisc appeared it was a step backwards and when the DVD appeared it was a LEAP backwards. I had the same experience when the comparing the AC-3 laserdisc of Pink Floyd's The Wall to the DVD. Everyone was enamored with little discs, sharper pictures and 5.1 surround sound. Nobody seemed to care about very lossy compression that took all the bite out of the tiger. I basically sat out buying DVD's and now that I have a mortgage and family chasing the the tail of perfect sound is reduced to good in ear monitors and lossless files on my iPhone.

Cheers, Michael

That's one of the best things about Blu-ray, lossless and uncompressed soundtracks.

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Glossary terms will be automatically marked with links to their descriptions. If there are certain phrases or sections of text that should be excluded from glossary marking and linking, use the special markup, [no-glossary] ... [/no-glossary]. Additionally, these HTML elements will not be scanned: a, abbr, acronym, code, pre.

More information about formatting options

Local Guides

 All Guides
   Alabama
   Alaska
   Arizona
   Arkansas
   California
   Colorado
   Connecticut
   DC
   Delaware
   Florida
   Georgia
   Hawaii
   Idaho
   Illinois
   Indiana
   Iowa
   Kansas
   Kentucky
   Louisiana
   Maine
   Maryland
   Massachusetts
   Michigan
   Minnesota
   Mississippi
   Missouri
   Montana
   Nebraska
   Nevada
   New Hampshire
   New Jersey
   New Mexico
   New York
   North Carolina
   North Dakota
   Ohio
   Oklahoma
   Oregon
   Pennsylvania
   Rhode Island
   South Carolina
   South Dakota
   Tennessee
   Texas
   Utah
   Vermont
   Virginia
   Washington
   West Virginia
   Wisconsin
   Wyoming